Skip to main content

When Boehner crows it is time to check on the chicks

When Boehner crows it is time to check on the chicks

I am not a scholar on public policy or even transportation.  However I have learned to watch  the sleight of hand that occurs in DC.  When  our policy makers pass legislation but only crow about there being no ear marks, I hear warning bells. 
As of this writing I have not fully read the bill but a few key things about it demand questioning.   I pulled from the following questions and quotes.
As I read on the website, I was immediately drawn to this statement:
“Several agricultural groups and the Waterways Council expressed support for the conference report - even though many were still digging through the details.” –
It seems I am not alone in fully reviewing the legislation that passed in the house.  As of May 15th 20014 neither had several agricultural groups and the Waterways Council.                                                                                                                
I skimmed down to the key points of the legislation.  There were some that raised immediate red flags.
Key points taken from
·         Streamlines environmental reviews and improves coordination
o   Shall we expect reduced safety and environmental requirements?
·         Reduces the inventory of properties that are not needed for the missions of the Army Corps of Engineers.
o   What happens to this inventory?  Is it auctioned off to private entities?  Will these entities be non-American? 
·         Maximizes the ability of non-federal interests to contribute their own funds to move studies and projects forward
o   Red flag. Red flag.  Is this line an invite for private entities to pay for studies to support projects?
·         Expands the ability of non-federal interests to contribute funds to expedite the evaluation and processing of permits
o   Again, red flag.  This line seems to allow for the payment of approval of projects  by private entities. 
·         Establishes a Water Infrastructure Public-Private Partnership Program and new options to expand the local role in project implementation
o   Again, red flag.  This line seems to say let’s get the public to pay for private use infrastructure.
·         Consolidates or eliminates duplicative or unnecessary studies and requires concurrent reviews
o   Line is confusing.  It seems on the surface to reduce the requirement for studies prior to the start of a project.  It seems to allow for projects to be pushed through without proper studies 

I don’t claim to be a scholar.  I am one who questions why and what in our public policy.  We should all ask and we should engage our elected officials about legislation.   I have not fully reviewed the legislation.  It is my hope those who focus on such things step-up to ask questions as well.  At a time when drought it becoming a fact of life in America, we must question policy regarding water.
As usual, please read the links.   


Popular posts from this blog

The Pure Driven Snow in Mississippi

Why We Need More People of Color Writing Syfy

This weekend due to an enduring cough, I decided to binge watch Wayward Pines.  In truth, I actually need to binge on Game of Thrones but I shall save that binge($$$$$) for my birthday.  Let me not chase that rabbit for now.  Wayward Pines is one example of how having majority White writers of science fiction/fantasy continue to ignore the actual composition of Earth's population, the societal norms of those populations, and the ability of those populations to thrive outside of White intervention.

I am a lover of Fantasy and Science Fiction since childhood. What I have noted over the years is a common theme, humans(White people) have changed the environment to the point of either some horrifying human mutation or some climate apocalypse.  I often wonder why in these writings we don't see an evolution that leads to world peace.  Start Trek is one of the few that shows the possibility for humans after we  learn to work for peace not war.  However,  even Star Trek fails to accur…