Skip to main content

When Boehner crows it is time to check on the chicks

When Boehner crows it is time to check on the chicks

I am not a scholar on public policy or even transportation.  However I have learned to watch  the sleight of hand that occurs in DC.  When  our policy makers pass legislation but only crow about there being no ear marks, I hear warning bells. 
As of this writing I have not fully read the bill but a few key things about it demand questioning.   I pulled from the following questions and quotes.
As I read on the website, I was immediately drawn to this statement:
“Several agricultural groups and the Waterways Council expressed support for the conference report - even though many were still digging through the details.” –
It seems I am not alone in fully reviewing the legislation that passed in the house.  As of May 15th 20014 neither had several agricultural groups and the Waterways Council.                                                                                                                
I skimmed down to the key points of the legislation.  There were some that raised immediate red flags.
Key points taken from
·         Streamlines environmental reviews and improves coordination
o   Shall we expect reduced safety and environmental requirements?
·         Reduces the inventory of properties that are not needed for the missions of the Army Corps of Engineers.
o   What happens to this inventory?  Is it auctioned off to private entities?  Will these entities be non-American? 
·         Maximizes the ability of non-federal interests to contribute their own funds to move studies and projects forward
o   Red flag. Red flag.  Is this line an invite for private entities to pay for studies to support projects?
·         Expands the ability of non-federal interests to contribute funds to expedite the evaluation and processing of permits
o   Again, red flag.  This line seems to allow for the payment of approval of projects  by private entities. 
·         Establishes a Water Infrastructure Public-Private Partnership Program and new options to expand the local role in project implementation
o   Again, red flag.  This line seems to say let’s get the public to pay for private use infrastructure.
·         Consolidates or eliminates duplicative or unnecessary studies and requires concurrent reviews
o   Line is confusing.  It seems on the surface to reduce the requirement for studies prior to the start of a project.  It seems to allow for projects to be pushed through without proper studies 

I don’t claim to be a scholar.  I am one who questions why and what in our public policy.  We should all ask and we should engage our elected officials about legislation.   I have not fully reviewed the legislation.  It is my hope those who focus on such things step-up to ask questions as well.  At a time when drought it becoming a fact of life in America, we must question policy regarding water.
As usual, please read the links.   


Popular posts from this blog

Not another gun violence blog post

It is simple in my view, we have a problem.  We must ask why are assault weapons, weapons that spray when fired, required in civilian life.  I am not against gun ownership. I do question those who are arming themselves with weapons more suited for battle than stopping home invasion.  Are these people expecting the American government to attack them? Why?

As details emerge from this latest mass shooting, it becomes more clear, we have a problem that is not solved by more guns.

Work to do

I am typing a few quick thoughts today.  This thought is about White people being real.  When I returned to Mississippi in 2002, I had planned to only be here two years.  I didn't wish my kids to be in the oppressiveness of Mississippi too long.   I like other young Black people left this state before the ink was dry decades earlier.  When I returned in 2002, I was to learn of a silent change in the state, White folks waking-up. 

They are sadly still not the majority in 2017 but they are growing daily.  Trump has helped many White people face the mirror no longer able to deny the truth.  They are now facing the results of hate without the filter of Confederate glasses.  Mississippi is a wreck and holding on to a divisive symbol of hate, our flag.  Centuries of hate in the state has left the state destitute to the point even White people are leaving in large numbers.   Those now leaving are exporting hate to other states that have done well economically by ending policy of hate.


The Pure Driven Snow in Mississippi